Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Drug Saf ; 46(10): 961-974, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37552438

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Dual diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (DA) therapy is the standard mass drug administration (MDA) regimen for lymphatic filariasis in Kenya. Following the recent World Health Organization recommendation, Kenya piloted triple therapy with ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole (IDA) in MDA. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a community-based, observational, cohort event monitoring study to compare the types, frequency, severity, and predictors of adverse events following dual versus triple therapy in 20,421 eligible residents. METHODS: Residents in Kilifi (n = 10,010) and Mombasa counties (n = 10,411) received DA and IDA through MDA campaigns, respectively. Adverse events were actively monitored through house-to-house visits on days 1, 2, and 7 after MDA. Any clinical events reported before and after MDA were cross-checked and verified to differentiate pre-existing events from MDA-associated adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 5807 and 3102 adverse events were reported by 2839 and 1621 individuals in the IDA and DA groups, respectively. The incidence of experiencing one or more adverse events was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the IDA group (27.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 26.4-28.2) than in the DA group (16.2%; 95% CI 15.5-16.9). Dizziness (15.9% vs 5.9%) and drowsiness (10.1% vs 2.6%) were the most common adverse events and significantly higher in the IDA group compared with the DA group (p < 0.0001). Most adverse events were mild or moderate with a few severe cases (IDA = 0.05%; 95% CI 0.35-0.78, DA = 0.03%; 95% CI 0.14-0.60). Female sex, obesity, taking three or more diethylcarbamazine or ivermectin tablets, and having pre-existing clinical symptoms were significant predictors of adverse events following IDA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole as a combination is as safe and well tolerated as DA to use in MDA campaigns with no serious life-threatening adverse events. Systemic mild-to-moderate adverse events with a few severe cases and transient adverse events are more common with IDA treatment than with DA treatment. Hence, integrating pharmacovigilance into a MDA program is recommended for the timely detection and management of adverse events.


Assuntos
Dietilcarbamazina , Filariose Linfática , Feminino , Humanos , Albendazol/efeitos adversos , Dietilcarbamazina/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/etiologia , Ivermectina/efeitos adversos , Quênia/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Masculino
2.
Trials ; 24(1): 5, 2023 Jan 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36597115

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) of azithromycin (AZI) has been shown to reduce under-5 mortality in some but not all sub-Saharan African settings. A large-scale cluster-randomized trial conducted in Malawi, Niger, and Tanzania suggested that the effect differs by country, may be stronger in infants, and may be concentrated within the first 3 months after treatment. Another study found no effect when azithromycin was given concomitantly with seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC). Given the observed heterogeneity and possible effect modification by other co-interventions, further trials are needed to determine the efficacy in additional settings and to determine the most effective treatment regimen. METHODS: LAKANA stands for Large-scale Assessment of the Key health-promoting Activities of two New mass drug administration regimens with Azithromycin. The LAKANA trial is designed to address the mortality and health impacts of 4 or 2 annual rounds of azithromycin MDA delivered to 1-11-month-old (29-364 days) infants, in a high-mortality and malaria holoendemic Malian setting where there is a national SMC program. Participating villages (clusters) are randomly allocated in a ratio of 3:2:4 to three groups: placebo (control):4-dose AZI:2-dose AZI. The primary outcome measured is mortality. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) will be monitored closely before, during, and after the intervention and both among those receiving and those not receiving MDA with the study drugs. Other outcomes, from a subset of villages, comprise efficacy outcomes related to morbidity, growth and nutritional status, outcomes related to the mechanism of azithromycin activity through measures of malaria parasitemia and inflammation, safety outcomes (AMR, adverse and serious adverse events), and outcomes related to the implementation of the intervention documenting feasibility, acceptability, and economic aspects. The enrolment commenced in October 2020 and is planned to be completed by the end of 2022. The expected date of study completion is December 2024. DISCUSSION: If LAKANA provides evidence in support of a positive mortality benefit resulting from azithromycin MDA, it will significantly contribute to the options for successfully promoting child survival in Mali, and elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04424511. Registered on 11 June 2020.


Assuntos
Azitromicina , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Humanos , Lactente , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Azitromicina/efeitos adversos , Mortalidade Infantil , Malária/prevenção & controle , Mali/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Trials ; 23(1): 627, 2022 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a major health problem, especially in sub-Saharan Africa where more than 90% of the disease and where nearly all deaths occur in children. Adding to this high burden is the co-existence of intestinal and genito-urinary helminth infections. Existing control programmes for these helminths are operating sub-optimally. Conversely, a malaria prevention programme, called seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC), introduced in 2012 has achieved more than 75% treatment coverage and prevented 75-85% cases of uncomplicated and severe malaria in children. This encouraging development supports the need to explore strategies involving the integration of helminth control with successful platforms such as SMC. This would align worm and malaria control within the Sustainable Development Goals of ending the diseases of poverty and promoting health and well-being for those at risk. METHODS: This study will have quantitative and qualitative components. The quantitative component will be a three-arm, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, interventional study of co-administration of SMC and anthelminthic drugs to pre-school and school-age children in Saraya district, southeast Senegal. Six hundred children aged 1-14 years will be randomly assigned to receive either SMC drugs only, SMC drugs and praziquantel or SMC drugs and albendazole and praziquantel at a ratio of 1:1:1. The primary outcome will be solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions to the study medications. The secondary outcomes will be the prevalence and intensity of Plasmodium-helminth co-infection and the prevalence of anaemia and mean haemoglobin concentration. The qualitative component of the study will include the conduct of structured interviews to assess the acceptability, feasibility, enablers and barriers to the combined use of anthelminthic and SMC drugs among randomly selected parents/caregivers of children enrolled in the study and health care workers responsible for the delivery of the combined services. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence to boost the public health recommendations for combined malaria and helminth control. If successful, this project will reinforce the evidence that health care systems in developing countries can be comprehensive health management rather than focussed on vertical management of a single disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05354258. Registered on 28 April 2022. PACTR202204794105273. Registered on 25 April 2022.


Assuntos
Anti-Helmínticos , Malária , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Adolescente , Anti-Helmínticos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Malária/prevenção & controle , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estações do Ano
4.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(2): e0010189, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35139080

RESUMO

The elimination of onchocerciasis through community-based Mass Drug Administration (MDA) of ivermectin (Mectizan) is hampered by co-endemicity of Loa loa, as individuals who are highly co-infected with Loa loa parasites can suffer serious and occasionally fatal neurological reactions from the drug. The test-and-not-treat strategy of testing all individuals participating in MDA has some operational constraints including the cost and limited availability of LoaScope diagnostic tools. As a result, a Loa loa Antibody (Ab) Rapid Test was developed to offer a complementary way of determining the prevalence of loiasis. We develop a joint geostatistical modelling framework for the analysis of Ab and Loascope data to delineate whether an area is safe for MDA. Our results support the use of a two-stage strategy, in which Ab testing is used to identify areas that, with acceptably high probability, are safe or unsafe for MDA, followed by Loascope testing in areas whose safety status is uncertain. This work therefore contributes to the global effort towards the elimination of onchocerciasis as a public health problem by potentially reducing the time and cost required to establish whether an area is safe for MDA.


Assuntos
Antiparasitários/uso terapêutico , Coinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Loa/efeitos dos fármacos , Loíase/tratamento farmacológico , Oncocercose/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Anticorpos Anti-Helmínticos/sangue , Antiparasitários/efeitos adversos , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/parasitologia , Feminino , Humanos , Ivermectina/efeitos adversos , Loa/genética , Loa/fisiologia , Loíase/epidemiologia , Loíase/parasitologia , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Modelos Estatísticos , Onchocerca/efeitos dos fármacos , Onchocerca/genética , Onchocerca/fisiologia , Oncocercose/epidemiologia , Oncocercose/parasitologia
5.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(11): e0008854, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33253148

RESUMO

The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis has made considerable progress but is experiencing challenges in meeting targets in some countries. Recent World Health Organization guidelines have recommended two rounds of triple-drug therapy with ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine (DEC), and albendazole (IDA), in areas where mass drug administration (MDA) results with two drugs (DEC and albendazole) have been suboptimal, as is the case in Samoa. In August 2018, Samoa was the first country in the world to implement countrywide triple-drug MDA. This paper aims to describe Samoa's experience with program coverage and adverse events (AEs) in the first round of triple-drug MDA. We conducted a large cross-sectional community survey to assess MDA awareness, reach, compliance, coverage and AEs in September/October 2018, 7-11 weeks after the first round of triple-drug MDA. In our sample of 4420 people aged ≥2 years (2.2% of the population), age-adjusted estimates indicated that 89.0% of the eligible population were offered MDA, 83.9% of the eligible population took MDA (program coverage), and 80.2% of the total population took MDA (epidemiological coverage). Overall, 83.8% (2986/3563) reported that they did not feel unwell at all after taking MDA. Mild AEs (feeling unwell but able to do normal everyday things) were reported by 13.3% (476/3563) and moderate or severe AEs (feeling unwell and being unable to do normal everyday activities such as going to work or school) by 2.9% (103/3563) of participants. This study following the 2018 triple-drug MDA in Samoa demonstrated a high reported program awareness and reach of 90.8% and 89.0%, respectively. Age-adjusted program coverage of 83.9% of the total population showed that MDA was well accepted and well tolerated by the community.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Filaricidas/efeitos adversos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Albendazol/efeitos adversos , Animais , Dietilcarbamazina/administração & dosagem , Dietilcarbamazina/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Ivermectina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Samoa , Wuchereria bancrofti/isolamento & purificação
6.
Parasit Vectors ; 13(1): 533, 2020 Oct 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33109267

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical signs of active trachoma are often present in the absence of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection, particularly following mass drug administration. Treatment decisions following impact surveys and in post-control surveillance for communities are currently based on the prevalence of clinical signs, which may result in further unnecessary distribution of mass antibiotic treatment and the increased spread of macrolide resistance alleles in 'off-target' bacterial species. We therefore developed a simple, fast, low cost diagnostic assay (DjinniChip) for diagnosis of ocular C. trachomatis for use by trachoma control programmes. METHODS: The study was conducted in the UK, Germany and Tanzania. For clinical testing in Tanzania, specimens from a sample of 350 children between the ages of 7 to 15 years, which were part of a longitudinal cohort that began in February 2012 were selected. Two ocular swabs were taken from the right eye. The second swab was collected dry, kept cool in the field and archived at - 80 °C before sample lysis for DjinniChip detection and parallel nucleic acid purification and detection/quantification by qPCR assay. RESULTS: DjinniChip was able to reliably detect > 10 copies of C. trachomatis per test and correctly identified 7/10 Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics C. trachomatis panel samples, failing to detect 3 positive samples with genome equivalent amounts ≤ 10 copies. DjinniChip performed well across a range of typical trachoma field conditions and when used by lay personnel using a series of mock samples. In the laboratory in Tanzania, using clinical samples the sensitivity and specificity of DjinniChip for C. trachomatis was 66% (95% CI 51-78) and 94.8 (95% CI 91-97%) with an overall accuracy of 90.1 (95% CI 86.4-93). CONCLUSIONS: DjinniChip performance is extremely promising, particularly its ability to detect low concentrations of C. trachomatis and its usability in field conditions. The DjinniChip requires further development to reduce inhibition and advance toward a closed system. DjinniChip results did not vary between local laboratory results and typical trachoma field settings, illustrating its potential for use in low-resource areas to prevent unnecessary rounds of MDA and to monitor for C. trachomatis recrudescence.


Assuntos
Chlamydia trachomatis , Patologia Molecular/métodos , Tracoma/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Criança , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tanzânia/epidemiologia
7.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(8): e0007009, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32804967

RESUMO

Ghana has been implementing Mass Drug Administration (MDA) since the year 2001, and Lymphatic Filariasis transmission has been interrupted in 76 out of the 98 targeted districts. The remaining districts have a microfilaria prevalence above the 1% threshold needed for the interruption of transmission. This study assesses the level of lymphatic filariasis MDA coverage and explored factors affecting the quality of implementation of the MDA in the Bole and Central Gonja Districts of Northern Ghana. A concurrent mixed methods study design approach was used to provide both a quantitative and qualitative insight. A descriptive analysis was carried out, and the results are presented in tables and charts. The transcripts of the qualitative interviews were imported into Nvivo and framework methods of analysis were used. The results were summarized based on the themes and buttressed with narratives with key quotes presented within the texts. The overall MDA coverage in Central Gonja is 89.3% while that of Bole district is 82.9%. Refusal to ingest the drug and adverse drug reactions were higher in Bole district than the Central Gonja District. The persistent transmission of lymphatic filariasis in Bole District was characterized by poor community mobilization and sensitization, nonadherence to the directly observed treatment strategy, refusal to ingest the drug due to the fear of adverse drug reactions, inadequate knowledge and misconceptions about the disease. Reported mass drug administration coverage will not necessarily result into interruption of transmission of the disease without strict compliance to the directly observed treatment strategy, strong stakeholder engagement coupled with evidence-based context-specific multi-channel community education strategies with key educational messages on the cause of the disease and adverse drug reactions. While the clock for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis by the year 2020 and meeting of the Sustainable Development Goal 3 target 3.3 by 2030 is ticking, there is an urgent need for a concerted effort to improve the fidelity of the ongoing lymphatic filariasis MDA campaigns in the Bole District of Northern Ghana.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Erradicação de Doenças/normas , Feminino , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Filaricidas/efeitos adversos , Gana/epidemiologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(6): e0008298, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32511226

RESUMO

In Haiti, 22 communes still require mass drug administration (MDA) to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (LF) as a public health problem. Several clinical trials have shown that a single oral dose of ivermectin (IVM), diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole (ALB) (IDA) is more effective than DEC plus ALB (DA) for clearing Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariae (Mf). We performed a cluster-randomized community study to compare the safety and efficacy of IDA and DA in an LF-endemic area in northern Haiti. Ten localities were randomized to receive either DA or IDA. Participants were monitored for adverse events (AE), parasite antigenemia, and microfilaremia. Antigen-positive participants were retested one year after MDA to assess treatment efficacy. Fewer participants (11.0%, 321/2917) experienced at least one AE after IDA compared to DA (17.3%, 491/2844, P<0.001). Most AEs were mild, and the three most common AEs reported were headaches, dizziness and abdominal pain. Serious AEs developed in three participants who received DA. Baseline prevalence for filarial antigenemia was 8.0% (239/3004) in IDA localities and 11.5% (344/2994) in DA localities (<0.001). Of those with positive antigenemia, 17.6% (42/239) in IDA localities and 20.9% (72/344, P = 0.25) in DA localities were microfilaremic. One year after treatment, 84% percent of persons with positive filarial antigen tests at baseline could be retested. Clearance rates for filarial antigenemia were 20.5% (41/200) after IDA versus 25.4% (74/289) after DA (P = 0.3). However, 94.4% (34/36) of IDA recipients and 75.9% (44/58) of DA recipients with baseline microfilaremia were Mf negative at the time of retest (P = 0.02). Thus, MDA with IDA was at least as well tolerated and significantly more effective for clearing Mf compared to the standard DA regimen in this study. Effective MDA coverage with IDA could accelerate the elimination of LF as a public health problem in the 22 communes that still require MDA in Haiti.


Assuntos
Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Antiparasitários/administração & dosagem , Dietilcarbamazina/administração & dosagem , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Albendazol/efeitos adversos , Animais , Antiparasitários/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dietilcarbamazina/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Haiti , Humanos , Ivermectina/efeitos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
10.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 19060, 2019 12 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31836757

RESUMO

Although WHO recommends mass drug administration (MDA) for malaria elimination, further evidence is required for understanding the obstacles for the optimum implementation of MDA. Just before the long rain in 2016, two rounds of MDA with artemisinin/piperaquine (Artequick) and low-dose primaquine were conducted with a 35-day interval for the entire population of Ngodhe Island (~500 inhabitants) in Lake Victoria, Kenya, which is surrounded by areas with moderate and high transmission. With approximately 90% compliance, Plasmodium prevalence decreased from 3% to 0% by microscopy and from 10% to 2% by PCR. However, prevalence rebounded to 9% by PCR two months after conclusion of MDA. Besides the remained local transmission, parasite importation caused by human movement likely contributed to the resurgence. Analyses of 419 arrivals to Ngodhe between July 2016 and September 2017 revealed Plasmodium prevalence of 4.6% and 16.0% by microscopy and PCR, respectively. Risk factors for infection among arrivals included age (0 to 5 and 11 to 15 years), and travelers from Siaya County, located to the north of Ngodhe Island. Parasite importation caused by human movement is one of major obstacles to sustain malaria elimination, suggesting the importance of cross-regional initiatives together with local vector control.


Assuntos
Ilhas , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Anemia/complicações , Animais , Antimaláricos/efeitos adversos , Antimaláricos/farmacologia , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Geografia , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Quênia/epidemiologia , Malária/parasitologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Adesão à Medicação , Parasitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Prevalência , Primaquina/efeitos adversos , Primaquina/farmacologia , Primaquina/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco
11.
PLoS Med ; 16(6): e1002839, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31233507

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) provides antifilarial medications to hundreds of millions of people annually to treat filarial infections and prevent elephantiasis. Recent trials have shown that a single-dose, triple-drug treatment (ivermectin with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole [IDA]) is superior to a two-drug combination (diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole [DA]) that is widely used in LF elimination programs. This study was performed to assess the safety of IDA and DA in a variety of endemic settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Large community studies were conducted in five countries between October 2016 and November 2017. Two studies were performed in areas with no prior mass drug administration (MDA) for filariasis (Papua New Guinea and Indonesia), and three studies were performed in areas with persistent LF despite extensive prior MDA (India, Haiti, and Fiji). Participants were treated with a single oral dose of IDA (ivermectin, 200 µg/kg; diethylcarbamazine, 6 mg/kg; plus albendazole, a fixed dose of 400 mg) or with DA alone. Treatment assignment in each study site was randomized by locality of residence. Treatment was offered to residents who were ≥5 years of age and not pregnant. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by medical teams with active follow-up for 2 days and passive follow-up for an additional 5 days. A total of 26,836 persons were enrolled (13,535 females and 13,300 males). A total of 12,280 participants were treated with DA, and 14,556 were treated with IDA. On day 1 or 2 after treatment, 97.4% of participants were assessed for AEs. The frequency of all AEs was similar after IDA and DA treatment (12% versus 12.1%, adjusted odds ratio for IDA versus DA 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.52, P = 0.316); 10.9% of participants experienced mild (grade 1) AEs, 1% experienced moderate (grade 2) AEs, and 0.1% experienced severe (grade 3) AEs. Rates of serious AEs after DA and IDA treatment were 0.04% (95% CI 0.01%-0.1%) and 0.01% (95% CI 0.00%-0.04%), respectively. Severity of AEs was not significantly different after IDA or DA. Five of six serious AEs reported occurred after DA treatment. The most common AEs reported were headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, fever, nausea, and fatigue. AE frequencies varied by country and were higher in adults and in females. AEs were more common in study participants with microfilaremia (33.4% versus 11.1%, P < 0.001) and more common in microfilaremic participants after IDA than after DA (39.4% versus 25.6%, P < 0.001). However, there was no excess of severe or serious AEs after IDA in this subgroup. The main limitation of the study was that it was open-label. Also, aggregation of AE data from multiple study sites tends to obscure variability among study sites. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that IDA was well tolerated in LF-endemic populations. Posttreatment AE rates and severity did not differ significantly after IDA or DA treatment. Thus, results of this study suggest that IDA should be as safe as DA for use as a MDA regimen for LF elimination in areas that currently receive DA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02899936.


Assuntos
Antiparasitários/administração & dosagem , Antiparasitários/efeitos adversos , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Adulto , Análise por Conglomerados , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Filariose Linfática/diagnóstico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Fadiga/induzido quimicamente , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
13.
Sex Transm Infect ; 95(7): 522-528, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30981999

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) of 20 mg/kg (maximum 1 g in adults) azithromycin for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection is a key component of the WHO trachoma elimination strategy. However, this dose may be suboptimal in Mycoplasma genitalium infection and may encourage emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to azithromycin. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of MDA for trachoma elimination on M. genitalium prevalence, strain type and azithromycin resistance. METHODS: A secondary analysis of CT-negative vulvovaginal swabs from three outpatient antenatal clinics (Honiara, Solomon Islands) from patients recruited either pre-MDA, or 10 months post-MDA in two cross-sectional surveys was carried out. Swabs were tested for M. genitalium infection using Fast Track Diagnostics Urethritis Plus nucleic acid amplification assay. M. genitalium-positive samples were subsequently tested for azithromycin resistance by sequencing domain V of the 23S rRNA DNA region of M. genitalium and underwent phylogenetic analysis by dual locus sequence typing. RESULTS: M. genitalium prevalence was 11.9% (28/236) in women pre-MDA and 10.9% (28/256) 10 months post-MDA (p=0.7467). Self-reported receipt of azithromycin as part of MDA was 49.2% in women recruited post-MDA and 17.9% (5/28) in those who tested M. genitalium positive. Of samples sequenced (21/28 pre-MDA, 22/28 post-MDA), all showed a macrolide susceptible genotype. Strain typing showed that sequence types diverged into two lineages, with a suggestion of strain replacement post-MDA. CONCLUSION: A single round of azithromycin MDA in an island population with high baseline M. genitalium prevalence did not appear to impact on either prevalence or azithromycin resistance, in contrast to reported decreased genital CT prevalence in the same population. This may be due to limitations such as sample size, including CT-negative samples only, and low MDA coverage. Further investigation of the impact of multiple rounds of MDA on M. genitalium azithromycin AMR in antibiotic experienced and naïve populations is warranted.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Azitromicina/efeitos adversos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Mycoplasma/epidemiologia , Mycoplasma genitalium/efeitos dos fármacos , Tracoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos Transversais , DNA Bacteriano/química , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Ribossômico/química , DNA Ribossômico/genética , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Melanesia/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tipagem Molecular , Infecções por Mycoplasma/microbiologia , Mycoplasma genitalium/classificação , Mycoplasma genitalium/genética , Mycoplasma genitalium/isolamento & purificação , Filogenia , Prevalência , RNA Ribossômico 23S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Tracoma/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
14.
Parasit Vectors ; 11(1): 588, 2018 Nov 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30424781

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Control of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in most of the sub-Saharan African countries is based on annual mass drug administration (MDA) using a combination of ivermectin and albendazole. Monitoring the impact of this intervention is crucial for measuring the success of the LF elimination programmes. This study assessed the status of LF infection in Rufiji district, southeastern Tanzania after twelve rounds of MDA. METHODS: Community members aged between 10 and 79 years were examined for Wuchereria bancrofti circulating filarial antigens (CFA) using immunochromatographic test cards (ICTs) and antigen-positive individuals were screened for microfilaraemia. All study participants were examined for clinical manifestation of LF and interviewed for drug uptake during MDA rounds. Filarial mosquito vectors were collected indoor and outdoor and examined for infection with W. bancrofti using a microscope and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) techniques. RESULTS: Out of 854 participants tested, nine (1.1%) were positive for CFA and one (0.1%) was found to be microfilaraemic. The prevalence of hydrocele and elephantiasis was 4.8% and 2.9%, respectively. Surveyed drug uptake rates were high, with 70.5% of the respondents reporting having swallowed the drugs in the 2014 MDA round (about seven months before this study). Further, 82.7% of the respondents reported having swallowed the drugs at least once since the inception of MDA programme in 2000. Of the 1054 filarial vectors caught indoors and dissected to detect W. bancrofti infection none was found to be infected. Moreover, analysis by qPCR of 1092 pools of gravid Culex quinquefasciatus collected outdoors resulted in an estimated infection rate of 0.1%. None of the filarial vectors tested with qPCR were found to be infective. CONCLUSION: Analysis of indices of LF infection in the human population and filarial mosquito vectors indicated a substantial decline in the prevalence of LF and other transmission indices, suggesting that local transmission was extremely low if occurring at all in the study areas. We, therefore, recommend a formal transmission assessment survey (TAS) to be conducted in the study areas to make an informed decision on whether Rufiji District satisfied WHO criteria for stopping MDA.


Assuntos
Culex/parasitologia , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Mosquitos Vetores/parasitologia , Wuchereria bancrofti/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Albendazol/efeitos adversos , Animais , Antiprotozoários/administração & dosagem , Antiprotozoários/efeitos adversos , Criança , Filariose Linfática/parasitologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Ivermectina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Tanzânia/epidemiologia , Wuchereria bancrofti/genética , Adulto Jovem
15.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 12(11): e0006944, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30419025

RESUMO

Lymphatic filariasis is widely endemic in Myanmar. Despite the establishment of an elimination program in 2000, knowledge of the remaining burden of disease relies predominantly on programmatic information. To assist the program, we conducted an independent cross-sectional household cluster survey to determine the prevalence of filariasis infection, morbidity and mass-drug administration coverage in four townships of the Mandalay Region: Amarapura, Patheingyi, Tada-U and Wundwin. The survey included 1014 individuals from 430 randomly selected households in 24 villages. Household members one year and older were assessed for antigenaemia using immunochromatographic test cards and if positive, microfilaraemia by night-time thick blood smear. Participants 15 years and older were assessed for filariasis morbidity by ultrasound-assisted clinical examination. The overall prevalence of infection was 2.63% by antigenaemia (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-4.04%) and 1.03% by microfilaraemia (95%CI 0.59-1.47%). The prevalence of hydrocoele in adult males was 2.78% (95%CI 1.23-6.15%) and of lymphoedema in both genders was 0% (95%CI 0-0.45%). These results indicate the persistence of filarial infection and transmission despite six rounds of annual mass drug administration and highlight the need for further rounds as well as the implementation of morbidity management programs in the country.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Wuchereria bancrofti/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Animais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Filariose Linfática/imunologia , Filariose Linfática/transmissão , Feminino , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Mianmar/epidemiologia , Parasitemia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Hidrocele Testicular/epidemiologia , Wuchereria bancrofti/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Lancet Glob Health ; 6(10): e1132-e1138, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30223985

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration has made a major contribution to the public health control of several important neglected tropical diseases. For settings with more than one endemic disease, combined mass drug administration has potential practical advantages compared with separate programmes but needs confirmation of feasibility and safety. We undertook a study of mass drug administration in the Solomon Islands for trachoma and scabies control using ivermectin and azithromycin, key drugs in the control of neglected tropical diseases worldwide. METHODS: The entire population of Choiseul province, Solomon Islands, was eligible to participate. An azithromycin-based mass drug administration regimen was offered in line with standard recommendations for trachoma elimination (oral azithromycin or topical tetracycline). An ivermectin-based mass drug administration regimen was offered at the same time (oral ivermectin or topical permethrin), with a further dose 7-14 days later, using a modified version of a regimen demonstrated to be effective for scabies control. All participants underwent safety assessments 7-14 days later. Participants in ten randomly selected sentinel villages underwent a more detailed safety assessment. Routine health system reports of hospital or clinic admissions and deaths were also obtained to compare health outcomes in the 12 month period before and after the mass drug administration. FINDINGS: The study enrolled 26 188 participants, 99·3% of the estimated resident population as determined at the 2009 census. Of those enrolled, 25 717 (98·2%) received the trachoma regimen and 25 819 (98·6%) received the first dose of the scabies regimen between Sept 1, and Oct 2, 2015. A second dose of the scabies regimen was received by 21 931 (83·7%) of participants. Adverse events, all mild and transient, were recorded in 571 (2·6%) of the entire study population and 58 (4·1%) of participants in the ten sentinel villages. In the 12 months before and after the mass drug administration the numbers of hospital admissions (1530 vs 1602) and deaths (73 vs 83) were similar. In the month after the mass drug administration, 84 individuals were admitted to hospital and two died, compared with a monthly median of 116 admissions (IQR 106-159) and six deaths (IQR 4-7) in the 12 months before and after the mass drug administration. INTERPRETATION: In the largest trial so far involving coadministration of regimens based on ivermectin and azithromycin, the combination was safe and feasible in a population of more than 26 000 people. Coadministration of mass drug administration based on these two drugs opens up new potential for the control of neglected tropical diseases. FUNDING: International Trachoma Initiative, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Scobie and Claire Mackinnon Trust, Wellcome Trust.


Assuntos
Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Doenças Endêmicas/prevenção & controle , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Doenças Negligenciadas/prevenção & controle , Escabiose/prevenção & controle , Tracoma/prevenção & controle , Administração Oral , Administração Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/efeitos adversos , Melanesia/epidemiologia , Escabiose/epidemiologia , Tetraciclina/administração & dosagem , Tracoma/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...